towards excellence in the civil service
Home
What is PCS
FAQ
PCS Policy Document - 2005
BCSR 2006
PCS Manual - 2006
Position Directory
Job Description
RCSC Home Page

Why are we moving from the Cadre System to the Position Classification System?

The Cadre System was introduced in 1989; 16 years on, it now requires to be strengthened to address some of the changes and emerging issues brought on by the rapid development of the country. The PCS is found to be an appropriate foundation towards promoting a merit-based and professional Civil Service that is dynamic, efficient and capable of meeting the changing needs of the public administration system.

Comparison between cadre system & position classification system
CADRE SYSTEM POSITION CLASSIFICATION SYSTEM

Promotions are awarded for years of service. No consideration is given to the competence required for the higher level position.

Promotions are need-based , focusing on performance, qualifications, experience and skills required to fulfill the higher level positions. Selection is through a fair, open and competitive process.


Qualifications are only recognised at the entry level.

Under the PCS, it is neccessary to upgrade your qualifications in order to qualify for new positions. There is recognition of qualifications at every level.


Civil servants upgraded on years of service in current position, not necessarily to shoulder higher responsibility, especially at the middle and lower levels.

Every position has only one grade. Up-gradation will be need-based entailing a new set of higher level duties that will be met through a merit-based, competitive selection process.


Cadre system does not call for development of comprehensive position descriptions.

Every civil service position will have approved generic and specific job description.


Grading decisions are inconsistent and do not consider other positions of comparable value.

Every position will be evaluated using the same objective system for position comparison across the civil service, and graded on the principle of ‘equal pay for equal value of work’.


Civil Servants are not clear about the performance expected in relation to the position held.

The job description clearly states the purpose, duties and responsibilities of the position and is used for performance review and evaluation.


Training and development is not effectively planned as positions do not have clearly identified requirements in terms of knowledge, skills and abilities.

Training and development requirements are linked through the job description to the needs of the organizations concerned and planned according to need, not availability.


Civil Servants are not clear about the performance expected in relation to the position held.

The job description clearly states the purpose, duties and responsibilities of the position and is used for performance review and evaluation.


The cadre system does not promote open and transparent selection processes where all eligible civil servants can be considered for vacancies.

All vacant positions will be notified throughout the civil service enabling qualified and experienced candidates to apply.


The cadre system has limited scope for expansion with no contingency to accommodate new professions and positions.

The PCS is a dynamic system that is able to absorb new positions and occupational groups as and when they are created.

Copyright © 2005 RCSC. All Rights Reserved.